Collapse

SearchPrint Pro-Baby Butcherers caught on camera "hail satan"


Pro-Baby Butcherers caught on camera "hail satan"
Date Added: 7/10/2013
Viewed: 1270 times

You may have heard that Texas is seeking to outlaw late-term abortions — the kind of abortions that kill a nearly full-grown baby who has eyes, ears, hands, a beating heart and can experience pain. The idea that such pre-born human beings cannot be murdered at will infuriates “pro-choice” abortion activists, and the true inspiration for their desire to kill babies has finally emerged. A truly bizarre, almost “creepy” video has just surfaced, revealing pro-abortion activists chanting “Hail Satan” in unison at the Texas State Capitol building. As you can hear for yourself in the video below, people in the background begin chanting, “Hail Satan!” during the speech of a woman who opposes late-term abortions. It appears at 5:12 in the video and continues for many seconds. The woman giving the speech is saying, “We have doctors down in Houston who are butchering women, butchering children…” and the pro-abortion people raise their voices, singing and chanting, “Hail Satan! Hail Satan!” over and over again. Later, pro-life advocates sang, “Amazing Grace,” completing the contrast between the abortion foes and the abortion advocates (who literally worship Satan). Even the Church of Satan was offended The chanting of “Hail Satan” garnered the attention of the UK Church of Satan which was offended by it. The church actually tweeted, “Unfortunate to see Satan’s name used in such a diabolical manner.”
Apparently the butchering of 20-week old children is too diabolical for even Satan! But it’s considered a “right” by U.S. abortion advocates.
Obviously, not all abortion activists are Satan worshippers, but you’ll notice that none of them have denounced the Satanists, either. By failing to denounce it, they effectively embrace and welcome Satan worship as part of their cause.
Note that Texas is not trying to ban all abortions; it’s only banning abortions after 20 weeks. You truly have to wonder what kind of woman keeps a baby for 20 weeks and then changes her mind and decides to kill it. This isn’t abortion; it’s the murder of a viable, conscious human being that’s more than 50% of the way toward birth (babies are typically born at 38 weeks). It is very difficult for any rational argument to be made that aborting a baby that’s 20, 25 or 30 weeks old isn’t the killing of a human being. Post-birth abortions: kill your baby up to age three But killing babies just before they’re born isn’t quite enough for these Satan worshippers. As has already been revealed, abortion activists want babies to be aborted even after they are born. The practice is called “post-birth abortion” (or simply “infanticide”) and abortion activists want women to have the “right” to kill their children up to age three! In support of the practice of murdering infants, two bioethicists, Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva, recently authored a paper that was published in the Journal of Medical Ethics entitled, “After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?” The “scientific” paper actually argues for the killing of babies as follows: [W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. It also states that, “newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons” and “the fact that both are potential persons is morally irrelevant.” The conclusion of the paper states, “…if a disease has not been detected during the pregnancy, if something went wrong during the delivery, or if economical, social or psychological circumstances change such that taking care of the offspring becomes an unbearable burden on someone, then [killing the baby is morally justified.]” In other words, if the parents simply decide they no longer want the baby after it’s born, it is completely justified to kill it. This is the actual position of these abortion advocates. So using the same "logic" these fools do, one can deduct that if they will pay someone to murder their child or support such a horrible act, then that person would probably victimize a child in any other for or fashion, and as a parent, I will just tell you I look at you worse than a child molester and would NEVER trust my child near you.  People that do such things are clearly hateful and seriously CRUEL people. What is truly sick is a certain "american Independent Baptist" named Peter S. Ruckman actually go as far to teach people that abortion is not murder that a unborn child in it's mother is only alive in the same sense a animal is alive.  This sure is a day when people will not hear sound doctrine.
While I only added to the end part of the article, I did not write most of it, however I will not give heed to the heathen source.


CommentAdd Comment/Rating


Other Articles by this Author

Back
Set us as your default homepage Bookmark us Privacy  This website has been created in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ—the name above every other name! Viewers: Members and Guests Page load time 0.094 seconds Go To Top Of Page